Isaeus, 7. On the Estate of Apollodorus

LCL 202: 248-249

Go To Section
Go To Section




Εὔπολις καὶ Θράσυλλος καὶ Μνήσων ἀδελφοὶ γεγόνασι. τούτων ὁ μὲν Μνήσων ἄπαις ἐτελεύτησεν, ὁ δὲ Θράσυλλος παῖδα καταλιπὼν Ἀπολλόδωρον· μόνος δ᾿ Εὔπολις καταλειφθεὶς πολλὰ τὸν Ἀπολλόδωρον ἠδίκησεν. ὅθεν Ἀρχέδαμος, πάππος τοῦ λέγοντος τὸν λόγον, τῇ τοῦ Ἀπολλοδώρου μητρὶ συνοικῶν μετὰ τὸν Θρασύλλου τοῦ ἀνδρὸς αὐτῆς θάνατον, καὶ τὸν Ἀπολλόδωρον ὡς ὀρφανὸν ἐλεῶν, πολλὰ τὸν Εὔπολιν ἀπῄτησε χρήματα ὑπὲρ ὧν Ἀπολλόδωρον ἠδίκησε. τούτων μεμνημένος Ἀπολλόδωρος εἰσήγαγεν εἰς τοὺς φράτορας θετὸν υἱὸν ἑαυτῷ Θράσυλλον τοῦτον, υἱὸν ὄντα τῆς [τε] ὁμομητρίας αὐτοῦ ἀδελφῆς καὶ <θυγατριδοῦν>1 Ἀρχεδάμου. τοῦ δὲ Θρασύλλου ἤδη μὲν εἰς τοὺς γεννήτας καὶ φράτορας ἐγγεγραμμένου, οὔπω δ᾿ εἰς τὸ ληξιαρχικὸν γραμματεῖον, ἐτελεύτησεν Ἀπολλόδωρος. καὶ μετὰ τὴν αὐτοῦ τελευτὴν ἐγγέγραπται μὲν ὁ Θράσυλλος εἰς τὸ ληξιαρχικὸν γραμματεῖον, οὐδὲν δ᾿ ἧττον Εὐπόλιδος θυγάτηρ, τοῦ θείου Ἀπολλοδώρου, ἀμφισβητεῖ πρὸς Θράσυλλον, λέγουσα μηδ᾿ ὅλως ἐγγεγράφθαι τὸν Θράσυλλον εἰς τοὺς φράτορας καὶ γεννήτας κατὰ γνώμην τοῦ Ἀππολλοδώρου, ἀλλὰ πεπλασμένην εἶναι τὴν ποίησιν. καὶ ἡ μὲν ὑπόθεσις αὕτη, ἡ δὲ στάσις στοχασμός· διὸ καλῶς πάνυ καὶ τεχνικῶς τὸν λόγον οἰκονομῶν τὴν ἔχθραν2 διεξέρχεται τὴν Ἀπολλοδώρου πρὸς Εὔπολιν, ὅπερ μέγα σημεῖον



VII. On the Estate of Apollodorus


Eupolis, Thrasyllus (I.), and Mneson were brothers, Mneson died without issue; Thrasyllus (I.) died leaving a son, Apollodorus; Eupolis, the sole survivor of the three, acted with great injustice towards Apollodorus. Archedamus, therefore, the grandfather of the man who makes the speech, being married to Apollodorus’s mother after her first husband’s death, pitying Apollodorus because he was an orphan, claimed a large sum of money from Eupolis on account of the wrongs committed by the latter against Apollodorus. Mindful of this kindness Apollodorus introduced Thrasyllus, the son of his half-sister and grandson of Archedamus, to his fellow-wardsmen as his adopted son. Thrasyllus (II.) had already been inscribed among the members of the families and of the ward, but had not yet been placed on the official register of the deme, when Apollodorus died. After Apollodorus’s death Thrasyllus (II.) was inscribed on the register; nevertheless the daughter of Eupolis, the uncle of Apollodorus, contested the succession against Thrasyllus (II.), alleging that it was not by any means in accordance with the wishes of Apollodorus that Thrasyllus had been inscribed among the wardsmen and kindred, and that the adoption was fictitious. Such is the subject of the trial; the discussion turns on a question of fact, and so, with great skill and ingenuity, the speaker explains the enmity of Apollodorus towards Eupolis, which

DOI: 10.4159/DLCL.isaeus-vii_estate_apollodorus.1927