Polybius, The Histories, Volume I

LCL 128: xxviii-xxix

Go To Section
Go To Section
Tools

have known something of it (cf. K. Ziegler, RE Polybius 1453, commenting on 35. 6). Another passage suggests that Polybius has received some critical reactions (38. 5.1). He himself reports that he addressed the Rhodian historian Zeno by letter and made him aware of mistakes he had made concerning the topography of Laconia. Zeno replied courteously, accepting the criticism, and added that he was unable to make changes, as he had already published his work (16.20.4–7). Such an exchange between two historians in antiquity is very rarely attested; it may recall the correspondence between Tacitus and Pliny the Younger on the eruption of Mount vesuvius in AD 79, when Tacitus, approaching the moment in which he would have to discuss the event in his Histories, wanted to learn more about the death of Pliny’s uncle in that catastrophe.

Despite its great popularity, the Histories has not survived in its entirety. Only the first five books are completely preserved; for the following, mainly excerpts remained, made by order of the emperor Constantinus Porphyrogennetus in the tenth century. At that time Books 17, 19, 37, and 40 had already been lost. The authors who used Polybius, usually without quoting him, are of great assistance in attempts to reconstruct the contents of the lost books and parts of the work.

Readers will find a more comprehensive and still very useful introduction to the author and his Histories in Konrad Ziegler’s article “Polybios,” RE 21 (1952) 1440–1578, and another valuable summary is F. W. Walbank, A Historical Commentary on Polybius, I (Oxford 1957) 1–37.

xxviii
Select Bibliography
  • Aalders, G. J. D. Die Theorie der gemischten Verfassung im Altertum. Amsterdam 1968.
  • Accame, S. Il dominio Romano in Grecia dalla guerra acaica ad Augusto. Rome 1946.
  • Ager, S. A. Interstate Arbitration in the Greek World, 337–90 b.c. Berkeley 1996.
  • Allen, R. E. The Attalid Kingdom: A Constitutional History. Oxford 1983.
  • Astin, A.E. Scipio Aemilianus. Oxford 1967.
  • ———. Cato the Censor. Oxford 1978.
  • Aymard, A. Les premiers rapports de Rome et de la Conféderation achaienne (198–189 av. J.-C.). Bordeaux 1938.
  • Badian, E. Titus Quinctius Flamininus: Philhellenism and Realpolitik. Cincinnati 1970.
  • Bagnall, R. S. The Administration of the Ptolemaic Possessions Outside Egypt. Leiden 1976.
  • Bar-Kochva, B. The Seleucid Army: Organization and Tactics in the Great Campaigns. Cambridge 1976.
  • Bastien, J.-L. Le triomphe romain et son utilisation politique. Rome 2007.
  • Bastini, A. Der Achäische Bund als hellenische Mittelmacht. Geschichte des achäischen Koinon in der Symmachie mit Rom. Frankfurt am Main 1987.
xxix